Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMolina Barea, María del Carmen
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-12T13:39:19Z
dc.date.available2018-01-12T13:39:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationContemporary Aesthetics 1 (2018)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/15827
dc.description.abstractThis essay aims to examine Aby Warburg’s Mnemosyne Atlas according to two conceptual perspectives that seem deeply interwoven, Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of rhizome and Michel Serres’s metaphor on Hermes. Both theoretical approaches cast light on the epistemological implications of the Mnemosyne Atlas and explore its intriguing composition from an innovative point of view. Specifically, this paper excavates the disrupted nature of the Warburgian Atlas, paying particular attention to the schizophrenic proliferation of unexpected connections. In this scenario, it will be necessary to elucidate the terminological opposition between ‘atlas’ and ‘archive,’ as studied by Boris Groys, Foucault, and Derrida, without leaving aside Didi-Huberman’s pioneering research on Warburges_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherRISDes_ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.subjectArchivees_ES
dc.subjectCartographyes_ES
dc.subjectGilles Deleuzees_ES
dc.subjectFélix Guattaries_ES
dc.subjectHermeses_ES
dc.subjectMnemosyne Atlases_ES
dc.subjectRhizomees_ES
dc.subjectSchizophreniaes_ES
dc.subjectMichel Serreses_ES
dc.subjectAby Warburges_ES
dc.titleRhizomatic Mnemosyne: Warburg, Serres, and the Atlas of Hermeses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=812es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem