Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlanzor Puente, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPons Barro, Águeda Laura
dc.contributor.authorHaba Giraldo, M.R. de la
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Bermejo, J.V.
dc.contributor.authorNavas González, Francisco Javier
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-16T12:12:41Z
dc.date.available2020-10-16T12:12:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/20523
dc.description.abstractDespite the undefinition of the origins of Ca de Rater (CR) and Ca de Bestiar (CB) dogs, references to these endangered autochthonous breeds highlighted their ratting/pet and shepherding/guard skills for centuries. Genealogical historical records were traced back to founders. Founder number in the reference population (146 and 53 for CR and CB, respectively), historical and reference maximum generations traced (eight and seven for CR and CB, respectively), and historical average number of complete generations (1.04 for both breeds) were determined. Structure assessment revealed the existence of subpopulations regarding criteria such as breeders (75 and 17), breeder location (32 and eight), owners (368 and 198), and owner location (73 and 51) for CR and CB, respectively. Average inbreeding (F) within breed subpopulations ranged from 0.27–1.20% for CB breeders and the rest of subpopulation criteria for both breeds, respectively, except for CB owners and owner location. F ranged from 0.27–1.41% for CB historical population and CR current population, respectively. The study of genetic diversity revealed a relatively similar genetic background between subpopulations. Average coancestry between and within breeds suggested a similar evolutionary process. However, Mann–Whitney U test determined significant differences for diversity parameters (F, ΔR, coancestry, nonrandom mating degree, maximum, complete, and equivalent generations, ΔF, and genetic conservation index) between breeds and their functionalities. Conclusively, functionality in dog breeds may determine the genetic diversity evolution of endangered breeds, even when these share the same geographic isolation conditions.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceAnimals 10(10), 1893 (2020)es_ES
dc.subjectRatting and huntinges_ES
dc.subjectGuard and shepherdinges_ES
dc.subjectFunctionalityes_ES
dc.subjectConservation strategieses_ES
dc.subjectPedigree-based assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectPopulation structurees_ES
dc.titleDoes Functionality Condition the Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Endangered Dog Breeds under Island Territorial Isolation?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101893es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record