• español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Improvement of Surface Roughness and Hydrophobicity in PETG Parts Manufactured via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): An Application in 3D Printed Self–Cleaning Parts

Thumbnail
View/Open
materials-12-02499.pdf (2.035Mb)
Author
Barrios, Juan M.
Romero, Pablo E.
Publisher
MDPI
Date
2019
Subject
Fused deposition modeling (FDM)
Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG)
Surface roughness
Sliding angle
Contact angle
Hydrophobicity
Self-cleaning
Taguchi method
ANOVA
METS:
Mostrar el registro METS
PREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique is used today by companies engaged in the fabrication of tra c signs for the manufacture of light-emitting diode LED spotlights. In this sector, the surface properties of the elements used (surface finish, hydrophobic features) are decisive because surfaces that retain little dirt and favor self–cleaning behavior are needed. A design of experiments (L27) with five factors and three levels has been carried out. The factors studied were: Layer height (LH), print temperature (T), print speed (PS), print acceleration (PA), and flow rate (F). Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) specimens of 25.0 25.0 2.4 mm have been printed and, in each of them, the surface roughness (Ra,0, Ra,90), sliding angle (SA0, SA90), and contact angle (CA0, CA90) in both perpendicular directions have been measured. Taguchi and ANOVA analysis shows that the most influential variables in this case are printing acceleration for Ra, 0 (p–value = 0.052) and for SA0 (p–value = 0.051) and flow rate for Ra, 90 (p–value = 0.001) and for SA90 (p–value = 0.012). Although the ANOVA results for the contact angle are not significant, specimen 8 (PA = 1500 mm/s2 and flow rate F = 110%) and specimen 10 (PA =1500 mm/s2 and F = 100%) have reached contact angle values above or near the limit value for hydrophobia, respectively.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10396/18937
Fuente
Materials 12, 2499 (2019)
Versión del Editor
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152499
Collections
  • DMec-Artículos, capítulos, libros...
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

De Interés

Archivo Delegado/AutoarchivoAyudaPolíticas de Helvia

Compartir


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital