Withdrawal periods after treatment of pigs with oxytetracycline in- and outside the European Union
Author
Lund, Daniel Hjorth
Petersen, Jesper Valentin
Antunovic, Boris
Belous, Madalina
Bonardi, Silvia
García-Gimeno, Rosa María
Jenson, Ian
Kautto, Arja H.
Majewski, Michał
Oorburg, Derk
Sakaridis, Ioannis
Sirbu, Alexandrina
Vieira-Pinto, Madalena
Vågsholm, Ivar
Alban, Lis
Publisher
ElsevierDate
2023Subject
Meat safetyAntimicrobial
Maximum residue limit
Withdrawal period
Acceptable daily intake
Risk management
Harmonisation
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Withdrawal periods are used to avoid animals being delivered to slaughter before the concentration of the
antimicrobial has declined to values below the maximum residue limit (MRL). This paper characterises the
withdrawal periods in force for oxytetracycline 100 mg/ml for intramuscular use in pigs. We investigated the
variation in duration of the withdrawal period between 68 oxytetracycline products from 29 countries in- and
outside the European Union. More specifically, we tested whether there is a regional difference, a difference
between major and minor pig meat exporting countries, whether the product is long-acting or not, and whether
year of market authorisation correlated with the withdrawal period. The results showed a large variation in
duration of the withdrawal periods, ranging from 5 to 40 days. Variation was observed both between and within
countries. Moreover, major exporting countries were associated with a longer withdrawal period than minor
exporting countries (P = 0.00099). There were no regional differences, and the year of market authorisation had
no impact, but long-acting products had a shorter withdrawal period than short-acting products (P = 0.048). The
variation in withdrawal periods observed questions the utility of using compliance with the withdrawal period as
a means of assessing whether the meat is safe for consumption. This is particularly relevant when a pig producer
unintentionally delivers pigs for slaughter before the withdrawal period has expired and, aware of this, informs
the abattoir. The findings call for further harmonisation in determining the withdrawal periods for all veterinary
medicinal products (VMP). Until this happens, if animals are prematurely sent to slaughter, we suggest that the
concentration of the VMP at the time of slaughter is calculated and compared with the MRL to determine meat
safety.