Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLinares Escudero, Olmo
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Jauregui, María
dc.contributor.authorCarranza Almansa, Juan
dc.contributor.authorSoliño, Mario
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-08T16:16:54Z
dc.date.available2025-01-08T16:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/30591
dc.description.abstractSustainability of land use is a guiding paradigm for natural resource policy in the 21st century and should also be pursued in wildlife management. We have bridged the theoretical sustainability framework with practical policy implementation by defining a certification scheme whereby landowners implement game management systems that are aligned with sustainability standards and audited by accredited bodies. Oversight is provided by a governance committee, comprising scientists, public officers, and certification body representatives, ensuring adaptability to evolving societal attitudes and regulatory changes. Using the Delphi method with a panel of 78 experts we defined key sustainability criteria for sustainable game management following a criterion of consensus. The agreed criteria were structured around three dimensions: game population, habitat, and socio-economic aspects, forming a coherent framework. The seven most important criteria for defining a certification system focused on maintaining or improving: 1) game population abundance, distribution, structure, and behavior compatible with conservation; 2) natural genetic characteristics of game populations; 3) diversity and conservation status of native game species; 4) diversity of native non-game species; 5) conservation status and diversity of habitats; 6) socio-economic functions and conditions of the activity; and 7) customer satisfaction. We discuss how the label derived from this certification could serve as an identity brand with positive effects on the recreational hunting market, but also that the promotion of this system requires the commitment of policy makers as well as the valuing of hunters against other options less respectful of the natural environment.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceLinares, O., Martínez-Jauregui, M., Carranza, J., & Soliño, M. (2024). Bridging sustainable game management into land use policy: From principles to practice. Land Use Policy, 145, 107269.es_ES
dc.subjectSustainable game managementes_ES
dc.subjectCertification schemees_ES
dc.subjectDelphi methodes_ES
dc.subjectWildlife managementes_ES
dc.subjectSustainability criteriaes_ES
dc.subjectGovernance committeees_ES
dc.titleBridging sustainable game management into land use policy: From principles to practicees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107269es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record