• español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular
  • DBBM-Artículos, capítulos, libros...
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular
  • DBBM-Artículos, capítulos, libros...
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparative proteomic analysis of BTH and BABA-induced resistance in pea (Pisum sativum) toward infection with pea rust (Uromyces pisi)

Thumbnail
View/Open
JPROT_2021.pdf (1.942Mb)
Author
Barilli, Eleonora
Rubiales, Diego
Castillejo Sanchez, Maria Angeles
Publisher
Elsevier
Date
2012
Subject
Proteomics
Pisum sativum
Uromyces pisi
Systemic acquired resistance
Benzothiadiazole
3-Aminobutyric acid
METS:
Mostrar el registro METS
PREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) to Uromyces pisi in pea was studied by using a proteomic approach. Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) was used in order to compare the leaf proteome of two pea genotypes displaying different phenotypes (susceptible and partial resistance to the fungus), and in response to parasite infection under the effect of two inducers of SAR, BTH and BABA. Multivariate statistical analysis identified 126 differential protein spots under the experimental conditions (genotypes/treatments). All of these 126 protein spots were subjected to MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry to deduce their possible functions. A total of 50 proteins were identified using a combination of peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) and MSMS fragmentation. Most of the identified proteins corresponded to enzymes belonging to photosynthesis, metabolism, biosynthesis, binding and defense response, whose behavior pattern was different in relation to susceptibility/ resistance of the genotypes studied and to the BTH/BABA induction to pathogen response. Results obtained in this work suggested that plants could reduce their photosynthesis and other energy metabolism and enhance the production of defense-related proteins to cope the stress. On the other side, we postulated that resistance induced by the chemicals operates via different mechanisms: BABA inducer could act via phenolic biosynthesis pathway, whereas resistance provided by BTH inducer seems to be mediated by defense and stress-related proteins. The results are discussed in terms of response to rust under the effect of inducers.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10396/30885
Fuente
Eleonora Barilli, Diego Rubiales, Mª. Ángeles Castillejo, Comparative proteomic analysis of BTH and BABA-induced resistance in pea (Pisum sativum) toward infection with pea rust (Uromyces pisi), Journal of Proteomics, Volume 75, Issue 17, 2012.
Versión del Editor
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.06.033
Collections
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • DBBM-Artículos, capítulos, libros...

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

De Interés

Archivo Delegado/AutoarchivoAyudaPolíticas de Helvia

Compartir


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital