Interaction of direct and social genetic effects with feeding regime in growing rabbits

View/ Open
Author
Piles, Miriam
David, Ingrid
Canario, Laurian
Rafel, Oriol
Pascual, Mariam
Ragab, Mohamed
Sánchez, Juan Pablo
Publisher
BMCDate
2017Subject
Animal geneticsRabbits
Feeding regime
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Most rabbit production farms apply feed restriction at fattening because of its protective effect againstdigestive diseases that affect growing rabbits. However, it leads to competitive behaviour between cage mates, whichis not observed when animals are fed ad libitum. Our aim was to estimate the contribution of direct (d) and social (s)genetic effects (also known as indirect genetic effects) to total heritable variance of average daily gain (ADG) in rabbitson different feeding regimens (FR), and the magnitude of the interaction between genotype and FR (G ╫ FR).
Methods: A total of 6264 contemporary kits were housed in cages of eight individuals and raised on full (F) orrestricted (R) feeding to 75% of the ad libitum intake. A Bayesian analysis of weekly records of ADG (from 32 to 60 daysof age) in rabbits on F and R was performed with a two-trait model including d and s.
Results: The ratio between total heritable variance and phenotypic variance (T 2) was low (<0.10) and did not differsignificantly between FR. However, the ratio between h2 (i.e. variance of d relative to phenotypic variance) and T 2 was~0.52 and 0.86 for animals on R and F, respectively, thus s contributed more to the heritable variance of animals onR than on F. Feeding regimen also affected the sign and magnitude of the correlation between d and s, i.e. −0.5 and~0 for animals on R and F, respectively. The posterior mean (posterior sd) of the correlation between estimated totalbreeding values (ETBV) of animals on R and F was 0.26 (0.20), indicating very strong G ╫ FR interactions. The correlationsbetween d and s in rabbits on F and R ranged from −0.47 (d on F and s on R) to 0.64.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that selection of rabbits for ADG under F may completely fail to improve ADG inrabbits on R. Social genetic effects contribute substantially to ETBV of rabbits on R but not on F. Selection for ADGshould be performed under production conditions regarding the FR, by accounting for s if the amount of food is limited.
