Welfare assessment at a Spanish Army Equine Breeding Centre

View/ Open
Author
Sanmartin Sanchez, Lourdes
Blanco-Penedo, Isabel
Perea Muñoz, Jose Manuel
Quinones Perez, Carlota
Delgado, Juan Vicente
Vega-Pla, Jose Luis
Publisher
Taylor & FrancisDate
2020-12-14Subject
Horse welfaremanagement
breeding
stallion
broodmare
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The study aimed to assess the effect of two management housing system on breeding horse
welfare. An adapted version of the assessment protocol for horses was used for that purposed to
this study, with the focus on the animal-based measures section. This includes individual animal
scoring of good feeding, good health and appropriate behaviour. The study was conducted in a
professional Equine Breeding Centre with a representative set of housing and management systems
and practices used for breeding purposes in Spain. A total of 49 stallions stabled individually
and 43 broodmares living loose housing in groups were subject for individual scoring. A
descriptive statistic for each welfare indicator was calculated. Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s
test were calculated between the different welfare measures and the housing system. Odds ratios
were computed to quantify the association of prevalence of welfare issues with husbandry and
management practices according to the type of housing. The stallions were almost two and a
half times more at risk than mares to exhibit acceptation to the chin contact behavioural test.
Broodmares were prone to present significant lower body condition scores (BCS). The prevalence
of rubbed and broken hairs in mane and tail (OR ¼ 4.413), gait abnormalities (OR ¼ 5.429), skin
lesions in upper and lower legs regions (OR ¼ 2.691) was higher in stabled animals. In contrast,
broodmares presented more often with general skin lesions, specifically in withers-back-barrelgirth
(OR ¼ 0.349), hindquarters (OR ¼ 0.016) and skin irritation in lower legs (OR ¼ 0.287). The
risk factor analysis applying a multivariable logistic regression model disclosed the way that the
group housing freedom system management predicted significantly the prevalence of three animal
based indicators deviations: one behavioural indicator (fear to the novel object test), one
feeding indicator (lower BCS) and one health indicator (harm in lower legs).