• español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Criterion Validity of the Isometric Contraction Test for Diagnosis of Axis I DC/TMD Considering Specific Muscles

Thumbnail
View/Open
J of Oral Rehabilitation - 2025 - Iglesias‐Peón - Criterion Validity of the Isometric Contraction Test for Diagnosis of.pdf (680.2Kb)
Author
Iglesias-Peón, Marcos
Mesa-Jiménez, Juan
Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César
Iglesias Peón, Carmen María
García Iglesias, Nuria
Bienvenido Villalba, María
Rodrigues-de-Souza, Daiana Priscila
Alburquerque Sendín, Francisco
Publisher
Wiley
Date
2025
Subject
Facial pain
Muscle contraction
Muscle disorders
Oral medicine
Temporomandibular disorders
Validation of results
METS:
Mostrar el registro METS
PREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background: To determine the validity of the Isometric Contraction Test (ICTest) for the DC/TMD in axis I regarding specificmuscles such as the masseter, temporalis and medial pterygoid muscles.Methods: Forty patients with a diagnosis of TMD axis I of muscle origin and forty healthy controls were evaluated with theICTest. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+)and negative likelihood ratio (LR−) were determined concerning the DC/TMD on axis I of muscle type, individually assessingthe masseter, temporalis and medial pterygoid muscles.Results: The ICTest achieved a sensitivity ranging from 41% to 88.9% in masseter and temporalis muscles with lower values forthe medial pterygoid muscle and when referred myofascial pain subtype was analysed. Specificity remained stable in both sit-uations, the subtype of myalgia and the muscles studied, ranging from 93.4% to 98.7%. The LR values indicated high variabilitydepending on the muscle and type of pain, although LR+ and LR− were ≥ 7.08 and ≤ 0.76%, respectfully, in all cases.Conclusions: The ICTest is highly specific when studying the masseter, temporalis and pterygoid muscles, with the latest oneshowing the poorest results. Referred myofascial pain exhibits the lowest validity for all the muscles.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10396/33088
Fuente
M. Iglesias-Peón, J. Mesa-Jiménez, C. Fernández-de-las-Peñas, et al., “ Criterion Validity of the Isometric Contraction Test for Diagnosis of Axis I DC/TMD Considering Specific Muscles,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (2025): 1–10.
Versión del Editor
https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70011
Collections
  • DEnf-Artículos, capítulos, libros...
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

De Interés

Archivo Delegado/AutoarchivoAyudaPolíticas de Helvia

Compartir


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital