Mechanical Performance of Wool-Reinforced Epoxy Composites: Tensile, Flexural, Compressive, and Impact Analysis

View/ Open
Author
Ruiz-Díaz, Carlos
Guerrero-Vacas, Guillermo
Rodríguez-Alabanda, O.
Publisher
MDPIDate
2025Subject
Natural-fibre compositesSheep wool fibres
Epoxy matrix
Mechanical properties
Tensile stress
Flexural behaviour
Compressive stress
Sustainable materials
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This study situates washed sheep-wool fibres as a sustainable reinforcement candidate for epoxy matrices and evaluates their mechanical response under tensile, flexural, compressive, and Charpy impact loading. The objective of this work is to assess whether short, washed sheep-wool fibres can function as a sustainable reinforcement for epoxy matrices, and to identify optimal fibre length–content windows that improve mechanical behaviour for engineering applications. Moulded–machined specimens were produced with fibre lengths of 3, 6, and 10 mm and contents of 1.0–5.0 wt.%, depending on the test; neat epoxy served as the reference. In tension, selected formulations—particularly 10 mm/1.5 wt.%—showed simultaneous increases in ultimate stress and modulus relative to the neat resin, corresponding to gains of about 10% in ultimate tensile stress and 50% in tensile modulus, at the expense of ductility. In flexure, the modulus decreases by roughly 15–35% compared with the matrix, whereas configurations with 3–6 mm at 2.5–5 wt.% raise the fracture stress by about 35–45% and improve post-peak resistance. In compression, reinforcement markedly elevates yield stress, with increases of up to about 160% at 3 mm/2 wt.%, while the ultimate strain decreases moderately. In Charpy impact, all reinforced materials underperform the resin, with absorbed energy reduced by roughly 75–93% depending on fibre length and content, with 3 mm/1 wt.% being the least affected. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that fibre length primarily governs tensile and compressive behaviour, while fibre content dominates flexural and impact responses. Overall, the findings support wool fibres as a viable reinforcement when length and content are optimized, pointing to their use in non-structural to semi-structural industrial components such as interior panels, housings, casings, protective covers, and other parts where moderate tensile/compressive performance is sufficient and material sustainability is prioritised.
