Beliefs, Barriers, and Stretching Practices Among Recreational Snowboarders and Alpine Skiers: A Cross-Sectional Study with a Generational Perspective

View/ Open
Author
Camacho, Julio
García-Moreno García, María de los Baños
Requena, Francisco
Camacho, Rocío
Pérez-Priego, Manuel
Agüera, Estrella I.
Publisher
MDPIDate
2026Subject
FlexibilityInjury prevention
Outdoor sports
Exercise adherence
Digital health information
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Stretching is commonly recommended to improve flexibility and reduce injury risk; however,
its practical implementation among recreational snowboarders and alpine skiers
remains inconsistent. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted during the 2024–2025
winter season. Of 403 collected responses, 391 valid questionnaires were included after data
screening. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, stretching perceptions,
practices, perceived barriers, information sources, and supervision. Descriptive statistics
and chi-square tests were used to explore associations between sport modality and generational
cohorts. Although 91.3% of participants considered stretching necessary, only 39.7%
reported performing stretching exercises in the previous six months. The most frequently
reported barriers were lack of time (76.1%) and low motivation (54.2%). Alpine skiers
attributed greater importance to stretching than snowboarders. Significant generational
differences were observed in sport modality, practice volume, and information-seeking
behaviour (p < 0.05), but not in stretching frequency or duration; therefore, Hypothesis 1
was not supported. Only 22.7% of participants reported receiving professional supervision.
In recreational winter sports, stretching is widely valued but inconsistently practiced.
Behaviour appears to be driven more by motivational and contextual factors than by generational
differences in practice frequency, highlighting the need for targeted educational
strategies and evidence-informed guidance.
