Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease In 2 Centers
Clinical Characteristics of Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

View/ Open
Author
Ahmed Hussein, Emad
Ahmed Talkhan, Hala
Allam, Mohamed F.
Nabil Kamel, Amr
Rushdy Elnajjar, Marwa
Mahmoud Zaki, Mohamed
Publisher
Ain Shams UniversityDate
2025Subject
Diabetes mellitusEndovascular treatment
Hypertension
Hypercholesterolemia
Obesity
Peripheral arterial disease
Surgical revascularization
Smoking
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Comparing revascularization outcomes between the UK and Egypt helps identify clinical differences, outcome predictors, and healthcare disparities, guiding context-specific management for diabetic patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Aim: This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and predictors among patients undergoing revascularization in two tertiary centres. Methods: From March 2019 to December 2021, diabetic PAD patients undergoing revascularization were recruited from Royal Free Hospital (RFH), London, UK, and Ain Shams University Hospitals (ASUHs), Cairo, Egypt. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, only 43 patients were included—17 from RFH and 26 from ASUHs—and followed for 3 months post-procedure. Sociodemographic data, medical history, and outcomes were collected. Egyptian patients also underwent pre- and postoperative testing for vascular inflammatory biomarkers: hsCRP, D-dimer, fibrinogen, Cystatin C, and LDL. Results: RFH patients were significantly older than ASUHs patients (70.1 vs. 60.5 years, p=0.004). Most were male (82.4% RFH, 84.6% ASUHs). ASUHs patients had higher rates of smoking (65.4% vs. 35.3%), obesity (50% vs. 11.8%, p=0.01), and hypercholesterolemia (76.9% vs. 17.6%, p=0.000). RFH patients had more renal insufficiency (58.8% vs. 3.8%, p=0.000) and foot ulcers (82.4% vs. 39.5%, p=0.006). Despite differences, favourable outcomes were similar (82.4% RFH vs. 88.5% ASUHs). Among ASUHs patients, postoperative reductions in LDL (p=0.03) and Cystatin C (p=0.13) were associated with better outcomes. Conclusion: ASUHs patients were younger and had different risk profiles, but clinical outcomes were comparable. Biomarker changes may help predict post-revascularization recovery.
