PLA filaments filled with PTFE/FEP fluoropolymers: effects on surface wettability, roughness, mechanical performance, and dimensional accuracy

View/ Open
Author
Guerrero-Vacas, Guillermo
Rodríguez-Alabanda, O.
Ruiz-Díaz, Carlos
Molero, Esther
Publisher
Springer NatureDate
2026Subject
PLAFFF
PTFE
FEP
Hydrophobicity
Contact angle
Sliding angle
Roughness
Water absorption
Dimensional stability
ANOVA
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) enables low-cost and flexible production of PLA parts; however, achieving highly waterrepellent surfaces without post-processing remains challenging due to the inherent process-induced texture and the sensitivity to formulation and printing conditions. This work evaluates whether incorporating fluoropolymers (PTFE or FEP) as fillers in PLA filaments can enhance repellency while maintaining printability and overall performance. Composite filaments (PTFE 1–40 wt%; FEP 1–50 wt%) were extruded and printed under constant parameters; wettability, roughness, water absorption, geometric stability, and tensile behavior were characterized, and a two-factor ANOVA was applied. On the bottom face, the water contact angle increased from 66.2° (PLA) to >120° (40 wt% FEP) and 116.5° (40 wt% PTFE), while the sliding angle (50 µL) decreased from 19.7° to 12.9° (40 wt% PTFE) and 13.8° (40 wt% FEP). Roughness decreased (Ra 33 to 6–8 μm; Rz 150 to <40 μm) and water uptake at 120 h dropped from 7.2% to 1.8% (40 wt% PTFE) and 3.6% (50 wt% FEP). FEP maintained flatness (≤0.045 mm), whereas PTFE increased warpage (~0.25 mm at 40 wt%). ANOVA confirmed a significant effect of filler content on wettability and strength (p≤0.002) and of fluoropolymer type on dimensional deviation (p=0.026), with adjusted R² ≈ 80–97%. Overall, PTFE maximizes barrier/hydrophobicity at the expense of dimensional accuracy, whereas FEP better preserves geometric stability while still achieving high
hydrophobicity.
