Biocontrol of root rot complex disease of Phaseolus vulgaris by Streptomyces sp. strains in the field

View/ Open
Author
Díaz Díaz, Miriam
Bernal-Cabrera, Alexander
Trapero Casas, Antonio
Jiménez-González, Alfredo
Medina-Marrero, Ricardo
Cupull-Santana, René Dionisio
Águila-Jiménez, Edisleidy
Agustí-Brisach, Carlos
Publisher
ElsevierDate
2023Subject
ActinobacteriaBiological control
Common bean
Root diseases
Soil-borne pathogens
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Soil-borne pathogens associated with root rot complex diseases cause major yield losses in common bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) worldwide. The lack of active ingredients available against these pathogens makes disease
control difficult. Seed treatments with Streptomyces spp. have been described as a potential ecofriendly strategy
against this complex disease. Here, we evaluate the effect of Streptomyces sp. strains CBQ-EA2 and CBQ-B-8 as
biological control agents (BCAs) against root rot complex disease of P. vulgaris, mainly caused by Macrophomina
phaseolina and Rhizoctonia solani under natural field conditions in Cuba. To this end, seed treatments with
Streptomyces sp. strains CBQ-EA2 and CBQ-B-8, using single or mixed applications, were examined. Seed treatments
with the BCA Trichoderma harzianum Rifai A-34 and the chemical Celest® Top 312 FS were included for
comparison. In all experimental fields, treatments with Streptomyces spp. had significantly higher efficacy in
reducing disease incidence (DI) and disease severity (DS) than the chemical Celest® Top 312 FS, and a similar
effect as that by the BCA T. harzianum A-34. Most of the treatments evaluated showed higher germination,
quality and yield of legumes than the nontreated control. Seed treatments using the combination of the two
actinobacterial strains (Streptomyces sp. CBQ-EA-2+ CBQ-B-8) showed higher effectiveness in reducing DI and
DS, and enhancing germination, yield and quality of legumes compared with the nontreated control, with a
similar effect as that with the BCA T. harzianum A-34 and the chemical Celest® Top 312 FS. Overall, microbial
consortia deserve further research in the future to develop potential biological products for crop protection.
