• español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Emerging Molecular Technologies in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Liquid Biopsy

Thumbnail
View/Open
cancers-11-00196-v2.pdf (1.148Mb)
Author
Cimadamore, Alessia
Gasparrini, Silvia
Massari, Francesco
Santoni, Matteo
Cheng, Liang
López-Beltrán, Antonio
Scarpelli, Marina
Montironi, Rodolfo
Publisher
MDPI
Date
2019
Subject
Renal cell carcinoma
Circulating DNA
CTC
Diagnosis
Follow-up
Genetic alteration
Target therapy
METS:
Mostrar el registro METS
PREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Liquid biopsy, based on the circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free nucleic acids has potential applications at multiple points throughout the natural course of cancer, from diagnosis to follow-up. The advantages of doing ctDNA assessment vs. tissue-based genomic profile are the minimal procedural risk, the possibility to serial testing in order to monitor disease-relapse and response to therapy over time and to reduce hospitalization costs during the entire process. However, some critical issues related to ctDNA assays should be taken into consideration. The sensitivity of ctDNA assays depends on the assessment technique and genetic platforms used, on tumor-organ, stage, tumor heterogeneity, tumor clonality. The specificity is usually very high, whereas the concordance with tumor-based biopsy is generally low. In patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), qualitative analyses of ctDNA have been performed with interesting results regarding selective pressure from therapy, therapeutic resistance, exceptional treatment response to everolimus and mutations associated with aggressive behavior. Quantitative analyses showed variations of ccfDNA levels at different tumor stage. Compared to CTC assay, ctDNA is more stable than cells and easier to isolate. Splice variants, information at single-cell level and functional assays along with proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics studies can be performed only in CTCs.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10396/17933
Fuente
Cancers 11(2), 196 (2019)
Versión del Editor
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020196
Collections
  • DEMQ-Artículos, capítulos...
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

De Interés

Archivo Delegado/AutoarchivoAyudaPolíticas de Helvia

Compartir


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital