Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAlsamrai, Osama
dc.contributor.authorRedel-Macías, María Dolores
dc.contributor.authorPinzi, Sara
dc.contributor.authorDorado, M.P.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T11:22:17Z
dc.date.available2024-05-22T11:22:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/28370
dc.description.abstractGlobal population growth and increasing pollution levels are directly related. The effect does not just apply to outdoor spaces. Likewise, the low indoor air quality is also having a negative impact on the health of the building residents. According to the World Health Organization, indoor air pollution is a leading cause of 1.6 million premature deaths annually. Tackling this public health issue, due to the direct relationship between air pollution levels and mortality and morbidity rates as well as overall comfort, is mandatory. Many companies have begun to build inexpensive sensors for use in Internet of Things (IoT)-based applications to pollution monitoring. The research highlights design aspects for sustainable monitoring systems including sensor types, the selected parameters, range of sensors used, cost, microcontrollers, connectivity, communication technologies, and environments. The main contribution of this systematic paper is the synthesis of existing research, knowledge gaps, associated challenges, and future recommendations. Firstly, the IEEE database had the highest contribution to this research (48.51%). The results showed that 87.1%, 66.3%, and 36.8% of studies focused on harmful gas monitoring, thermal comfort parameters, and particulate matter levels pollution, respectively. The most studied harmful gases were CO2, CO, NO2, O3, SO2, SnO2, and volatile organic compounds. The cost of the sensors was suitable for people with limited incomes and mostly under USD 5, rising to USD 30 for specific types. Additionally, 40.35% of systems were based on ESP series (ESP8266 and ESP32) microcontrollers, with ESP8266 being preferred in 34 studies. Likewise, IoT cloud and web services were the preferred interfaces (53.28%), while the most frequent communication technology was Wi-Fi (67.37%). Indoor environments (39.60%) were the most studied ones, while the share for outdoor environments reached 20.79% of studies. This is an indication that pollution in closed environments has a direct impact on living quality. As a general conclusion, IoT-based applications may be considered as reliable and cheap alternatives for indoor and outdoor pollution monitoring.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceAlsamrai, O.; Redel-Macias, M.D.; Pinzi, S.; Dorado, M.P. A Systematic Review for Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollution Monitoring Systems Based on Internet of Things. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4353.es_ES
dc.subjectAir qualityes_ES
dc.subjectSustainable low-cost sensorses_ES
dc.subjectEnvironmental contaminationes_ES
dc.subjectParticulate matteres_ES
dc.titleA Systematic Review for Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollution Monitoring Systems Based on Internet of Thingses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su16114353es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDGobierno de España.AEI/PID2019-105936RB-C21es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDGobierno de España.AEI/TED2021-130596B-C22es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem