• español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • OpenAIRE (Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • OpenAIRE (Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies

Thumbnail
View/Open
cometla1.pdf (6.660Mb)
Author
Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
Martín-López, Berta
Daw, Tim M.
Bohensky, Erin L.
Butler, James R.A.
Hill, Rosemary
Martín-Ortega, Julia
Quinlan, Allyson
Ravera, Federica
Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel
Thyresson, Matilda
Mistry, Jayalaxshmi
Palomo, Ignacio
Peterson, Garry D.
Plieninger, Tobias
Waylen, Kerry A.
Beac, Dylan M.
Bohnet, Iris C.
Hamann, Maike
Hanspach, Jan
Hubacek, Klaus
Lavorel, Sandra
Vilardy, Sandra P.
Publisher
Resilience Alliance Publications
Date
2015
Subject
Futures research
Methodological insights
Participation
Place-based research
Scenarios
Social-ecological systems
METS:
Mostrar el registro METS
PREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Participatory scenario planning (PSP) is an increasingly popular tool in place-based environmental research for evaluating alternative futures of social-ecological systems. Although a range of guidelines on PSP methods are available in the scientific and grey literature, there is a need to reflect on existing practices and their appropriate application for different objectives and contexts at the local scale, as well as on their potential perceived outcomes. We contribute to theoretical and empirical frameworks by analyzing how and why researchers assess social-ecological systems using place-based PSP, hence facilitating the appropriate uptake of such scenario tools in the future. We analyzed 23 PSP case studies conducted by the authors in a wide range of social-ecological settings by exploring seven aspects: (1) the context; (2) the original motivations and objectives; (3) the methodological approach; (4) the process; (5) the content of the scenarios; (6) the outputs of the research; and (7) the monitoring and evaluation of the PSP process. This was complemented by a reflection on strengths and weaknesses of using PSP for the place-based social-ecological research. We conclude that the application of PSP, particularly when tailored to shared objectives between local people and researchers, has enriched environmental management and scientific research through building common understanding and fostering learning about future planning of social-ecological systems. However, PSP still requires greater systematic monitoring and evaluation to assess its impact on the promotion of collective action for transitions to sustainability and the adaptation to global environmental change and its challenges.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10396/15482
Fuente
Ecology and Society 20(4), 32 (2015)
Versión del Editor
http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07985-200432
Collections
  • OpenAIRE (Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

De Interés

Archivo Delegado/AutoarchivoAyudaPolíticas de Helvia

Compartir


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital