• español
    • English
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Validation Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis

Thumbnail
View/Open
diagnostics-10-00426.pdf (732.9Kb)
Author
Aranda-Valera, I. Concepción
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio
Garrido Castro, Juan Luis
Gardiner, Philip V.
López Medina, Eloísa Clementina
Machado, Pedro M.
Condell, Joan
Connolly, James
Williams, Jonathan M.
Muñoz-Esquivel, Karla
O’Dwyer, Tom
Castro Villegas, María del Carmen
González-Navas, Cristina
Collantes Estévez, Eduardo
iMaxSpA Study Group
Publisher
MDPI
Date
2020
Subject
Axial spondyloarthritis
Spinal mobility
Inertial measurement unit
METS:
Mostrar el registro METS
PREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) are beginning to be used in human motion analysis. These devices can be useful for the evaluation of spinal mobility in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objectives of this study were to assess (a) concurrent criterion validity in individuals with axSpA by comparing spinal mobility measured by an IMU sensor-based system vs. optical motion capture as the reference standard; (b) discriminant validity comparing mobility with healthy volunteers; (c) construct validity by comparing mobility results with relevant outcome measures. A total of 70 participants with axSpA and 20 healthy controls were included. Individuals with axSpA completed function and activity questionnaires, and their mobility was measured using conventional metrology for axSpA, an optical motion capture system, and an IMU sensor-based system. The UCOASMI, a metrology index based on measures obtained by motion capture, and the IUCOASMI, the same index using IMU measures, were also calculated. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to show the relationships between outcome measures. There was excellent agreement (ICC > 0.90) between both systems and a significant correlation between the IUCOASMI and conventional metrology (r = 0.91), activity (r = 0.40), function (r = 0.62), quality of life (r = 0.55) and structural change (r = 0.76). This study demonstrates the validity of an IMU system to evaluate spinal mobility in axSpA. These systems are more feasible than optical motion capture systems, and they could be useful in clinical practice.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10396/20200
Fuente
Diagnostics 10(6), 426 (2020)
Versión del Editor
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060426
Collections
  • DMed-Artículos, capítulos, libros...
  • DIAN-Artículos, capítulos, libros...
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

De Interés

Archivo Delegado/AutoarchivoAyudaPolíticas de Helvia

Compartir


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital