Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFlores Fraile, Javier
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Valverde, Nansi
dc.contributor.authorGarcía de Castro Andews, Arcadio
dc.contributor.authorSantos Marino, Juan Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRamírez, Juan M.
dc.contributor.authorGómez de Diego, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Javier
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Valverde, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Antona, Leticia Alejandra
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-08T10:50:15Z
dc.date.available2020-07-08T10:50:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/20298
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Maxillary bone defects related to post-extraction alveolar ridge resorption are usual. These defects may lead to failure in further surgical implant phases given the lack of bone volume to perform the dental implant. The objective of this clinical assay was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an experimental synthetic bone substitute in the preservation of post-extraction maxillary alveoli. Materials and Methods: 33 voluntary patients who had at least one maxillary premolar tooth that was a candidate for exodontia (n = 39) and subsequent implant rehabilitation participated. The regenerated alveoli were monitored by means of periodic clinical examinations (days 9 ± 1, 21 ± 4, 42 ± 6, and 84 ± 6), measuring the height and width of the alveolar crest (days 0 and 180 ± 5), measurement of radiodensity using tomographic techniques (days 0–5 and 175 ± 5), and histological examination of biopsies collected at 180 ± 5 days. Results: No significant differences were observed during the entire follow-up period between the two groups with respect to the safety variables studied. A variation in width of −0.9 ± 1.3 mm and −0.6 ± 1.5 mm, and a variation in height of −0.1 ± 0.9 mm and −0.3 ± 0.7 mm was observed for experimental material Sil-Oss® and Bio-Oss®, respectively. The radiodensity of the alveoli regenerated with the experimental material was significantly lower than that corresponding to Bio-Oss®. However, the histological study showed greater osteoid matrix and replacement of the material with newformed bone in the implanted beds with the experimental material. Conclusions: Both materials can be used safely and proved equally effective in maintaining alveolar flange dimensions, they are also histologically biocompatible, bioactive and osteoconductive. The experimental material showed the advantage of being resorbable and replaced with newformed bone, in addition to promoting bone regeneration.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceMedicina 56(2), 46 (2020)es_ES
dc.subjectBone substitutees_ES
dc.subjectPost-extraction socketes_ES
dc.subjectAlveolar preservationes_ES
dc.subjectControlled clinical triales_ES
dc.titleSafety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Material Based on Monetite, Silica Gel, PS-Wallastonite, and a Hydroxyapatite Calcium Deficient: A Randomized Comparative Clinic Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56020046es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDGobierno de España. IPT-2012-0560-010000 (INNPACTO)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem