Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLópez-Beltrán, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCimadamore, Alessia
dc.contributor.authorBlanca, Ana
dc.contributor.authorMassari, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorVau, Nuno
dc.contributor.authorScarpelli, Marina
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Liang
dc.contributor.authorMontironi, Rodolfo
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T12:34:46Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T12:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/20946
dc.description.abstractA number of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as first-line therapy in case of cisplatin-ineligible patients or as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) of the bladder. About 30% of patients with mUC will respond to ICIs immunotherapy. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression detected by immunohistochemistry seems to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mUC as supported by the objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) associated with the response observed in most clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, demonstrated better OS respective to chemotherapy in a randomized phase 3 study for second-line treatment of mUC. Nivolumab, a PD-1 antibody, also demonstrated an OS benefit when compared to controls. Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, and Avelumab antibodies targeting PD-L1 have also received approval as second-line treatments for mUC with durable response for more than 1 year in selected patients. Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab also received approval for first-line treatment of patients that are ineligible for cisplatin. A focus on the utility of ICIs in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or as combination with chemotherapy, is the basis of some ongoing trials. The identification of a clinically useful biomarker, single or in association, to determine the optimal ICIs treatment for patients with mUC is very much needed as emphasized by the current literature. In this review, we examined relevant clinical trial results with ICIs in patients with mUC alone or as part of drug combinations; emphasis is also placed on the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. The current landscape of selected biomarkers of response to ICIs including anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is also briefly reviewed.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceCancers 13(1), 131 (2021)es_ES
dc.subjectBladder canceres_ES
dc.subjectVariant histologyes_ES
dc.subjectUrotheliumes_ES
dc.subjectPD-1es_ES
dc.subjectPD-L1es_ES
dc.subjectImmunotherapyes_ES
dc.subjectTumor mutation burdenes_ES
dc.subjectImmune checkpoint inhibitores_ES
dc.subjectBiomarkeres_ES
dc.subjectDurvalumabes_ES
dc.subjectAtezolizumabes_ES
dc.subjectNivolumabes_ES
dc.subjectPembrolizumabes_ES
dc.subjectAvelumabes_ES
dc.titleImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Bladder Canceres_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010131es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem