Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartín-García, Francisco José
dc.contributor.authorPalacios-Fernández, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorLópez de Lerma, Nieves
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Martínez, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorMauricio, Juan C.
dc.contributor.authorPeinado, Rafael A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T10:11:28Z
dc.date.available2023-06-13T10:11:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2311-5637
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/25506
dc.description.abstractThis study compares three yeast strains: two wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (Sc1 and Sc5) and a commercial strain (Lc). The objective is to assess their fermentation efficiency and volatile compound production. The factors examined are yeast strain, initial sugar concentration of the must, and the presence of sulfur dioxide. Volatile aroma compounds, determined via GC–MS, were categorized into aromatic series based on aroma descriptors. Out of the volatile compounds analyzed, the yeast strain influenced 39, while sugar content and sulfur dioxide affected 16 and 23 compounds, respectively. Twelve compounds displayed odor activity values exceeding unity, with notable contributions from ethyl esters, β-damascenone, and β-ionone, impacting fruit, floral, and herbal aromatic series. Overall, the Sc1 yeast strain exhibited higher values in the aromatic series compared to the Lc strain. Multivariate analysis revealed that the Sc1 strain highlighted green fruit, citrus, and spice series, while the Lc strain stood out for smoky and herbal aromas. Cluster and principal component analyses emphasized that the aromatic composition of wines produced with wild yeast strains is more influenced by sulfur dioxide than initial sugar content, whereas the opposite holds true for the commercial strain. The key aroma series distinguishing between yeast strains were fruity, green fruit, and citrus for Sc1, and herbal, floral, and smoky for Lc. In conclusion, the Sc1 wild yeast strain showed similar fermentation behavior to the commercial strain, resulting in increased aroma compound presence. The distinctive aromatic profiles contributed by each strain enable winemakers to leverage this diversity and create wines that emphasize specific aromas.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceFermentation, 9(6), 541 (2023)es_ES
dc.subjectFermentation efficiencyes_ES
dc.subjectSaccharomyces cerevisiaees_ES
dc.subjectSugar concentrationes_ES
dc.subjectSulfur dioxidees_ES
dc.subjectVolatilomees_ES
dc.subjectWild yeastes_ES
dc.subjectWinees_ES
dc.titleThe effect of yeast, sugar and sulfur dioxide on the volatile compounds in winees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9060541es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem