Permanent grasslands in Europe: Land use change and intensification decrease their multifunctionality

View/ Open
Author
Schils, Rene
Bufe, Conny
Rhymer, Caroline
Francksen, Richard M.
Klaus, Valentin H.
Abdallad, Mohamed
Milazzo, Filippo
Lellei-Kovács, Eszter
ten Berge, H.
Bertora, Chiara
Chodkiewicz, Anna
Dǎmǎtîrcǎ, Claudia
Feigenwinter, Iris
Fernández Rebollo, Pilar
Ghiasi, Shiva
Stanislav, Hejduk
Hiron, Mattew
Janicka, Maria
Pellaton, Raoul
Smith, Kate
Thorman, Rachel
Vanwalleghem, Tom
Williams, John
Zavattaro, L.
Kampen, Jarl
Derkx, Ria
Smith, Pete
Whittingham, Mark J.
Buchmann, Nina
Newell-Price, Paul
Publisher
ElsevierDate
2022Subject
Agro-ecologyEcosystem services
Grassland
Land use change
Systematic literature review
METS:
Mostrar el registro METSPREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMISMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Permanent grasslands cover 34% of the European Union’s agricultural area and are vital for a wide variety of ecosystem services essential for our society. Over recent decades, the permanent grassland area has declined and land use change continues to threaten its extent. Simultaneously, the management intensity of permanent grasslands increased. We performed a systematic literature review on the multifunctionality of permanent grasslands in Europe, examining the effects of land use and management on 19 grassland ecosystem service indicators. Based on the evidence in 696 out of 70,456 screened papers, published since 1980, we found that both land use change and intensification of management decreased multifunctionality. In particular, preventing conversion of permanent grasslands to croplands secured the delivery of multiple ecosystem services. A lower management intensity was associated with benefits for biodiversity, climate regulation and water purification, but impacted the provision of high-quality animal feed. Increasing the number of species in the sward enhanced multifunctionality of permanent grassland without significant trade-offs such as losses in production. Our review covered many aspects of land use, management and ecosystem services, but we also identified areas with no or only few studies. The most prominent gaps were related to comparisons between permanent and temporary grasslands, and effects of management practices on the provision of cultural values, and on erosion and flood control. We suggest that, despite apparent changes in human dietary preferences, the protection of permanent grasslands in Europe must be prioritised. At the same time, considering the need to reduce ruminant livestock’s contribution to climate change, the time seems ripe to increase support for low-intensity grassland management to optimise the provision of essential ecosystem services from Europe’s permanent grasslands
Description
Datos de investigación disponibles en: https://doi.org/10.4121/17888573