Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAranda-Valera, I. Concepción
dc.contributor.authorCuesta-Vargas, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorGarrido Castro, Juan Luis
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Philip V.
dc.contributor.authorLópez Medina, Eloísa Clementina
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Pedro M.
dc.contributor.authorCondell, Joan
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, James
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Esquivel, Karla
dc.contributor.authorO’Dwyer, Tom
dc.contributor.authorCastro Villegas, María del Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Navas, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorCollantes Estévez, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authoriMaxSpA Study Group
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-24T12:53:08Z
dc.date.available2020-06-24T12:53:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10396/20200
dc.description.abstractPortable inertial measurement units (IMUs) are beginning to be used in human motion analysis. These devices can be useful for the evaluation of spinal mobility in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objectives of this study were to assess (a) concurrent criterion validity in individuals with axSpA by comparing spinal mobility measured by an IMU sensor-based system vs. optical motion capture as the reference standard; (b) discriminant validity comparing mobility with healthy volunteers; (c) construct validity by comparing mobility results with relevant outcome measures. A total of 70 participants with axSpA and 20 healthy controls were included. Individuals with axSpA completed function and activity questionnaires, and their mobility was measured using conventional metrology for axSpA, an optical motion capture system, and an IMU sensor-based system. The UCOASMI, a metrology index based on measures obtained by motion capture, and the IUCOASMI, the same index using IMU measures, were also calculated. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to show the relationships between outcome measures. There was excellent agreement (ICC > 0.90) between both systems and a significant correlation between the IUCOASMI and conventional metrology (r = 0.91), activity (r = 0.40), function (r = 0.62), quality of life (r = 0.55) and structural change (r = 0.76). This study demonstrates the validity of an IMU system to evaluate spinal mobility in axSpA. These systems are more feasible than optical motion capture systems, and they could be useful in clinical practice.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceDiagnostics 10(6), 426 (2020)es_ES
dc.subjectAxial spondyloarthritises_ES
dc.subjectSpinal mobilityes_ES
dc.subjectInertial measurement unites_ES
dc.titleMeasuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Validation Study in Axial Spondyloarthritises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060426es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDJunta de Andalucía. PIN-0079-2016es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDInstituto de Salud Carlos III. DTS18/00046es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem