• español
    • English
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Acceder
Ver ítem 
  •   Helvia Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • Ver ítem
  •   Helvia Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Modelling Ephemeral Gully Erosion from Unpaved Urban Roads: Equifinality and Implications for Scenario Analysis

Thumbnail
Ver/
geosciences-08-00137-v2.pdf (1.218Mb)
Autor
Gudino-Elizondo, Napoleon
Biggs, Trent W.
Bingner, Ronald L.
Yuan, Yongping
Langendoen, Eddy J.
Taniguchi, Kristine T.
Kretzschmar, Thomas
Taguas Ruiz, Encarnación
Liden, Douglas
Editor
MDPI
Fecha
2018
Materia
Gully erosion
Unpaved roads
AnnAGNPS model
Model equifinality
Urbanization
Watershed management
METS:
Mostrar el registro METS
PREMIS:
Mostrar el registro PREMIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
Modelling gully erosion in urban areas is challenging due to difficulties with equifinality and parameter identification, which complicates quantification of management impacts on runoff and sediment production. We calibrated a model (AnnAGNPS) of an ephemeral gully network that formed on unpaved roads following a storm event in an urban watershed (0.2 km2) in Tijuana, Mexico. Latin hypercube sampling was used to create 500 parameter ensembles. Modelled sediment load was most sensitive to the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve number, tillage depth (TD), and critical shear stress ( c). Twenty-one parameter ensembles gave acceptable error (behavioural models), though changes in parameters governing runoff generation (SCS curve number, Manning’s n) were compensated by changes in parameters describing soil properties (TD, c), resulting in uncertainty in the optimal parameter values. The most suitable parameter combinations or “behavioural models” were used to evaluate uncertainty under management scenarios. Paving the roads increased runoff by 146–227%, increased peak discharge by 178–575%, and decreased sediment load by 90–94% depending on the ensemble. The method can be used in other watersheds to simulate runoff and gully erosion, to quantify the uncertainty of model-estimated impacts of management activities on runoff and erosion, and to suggest critical field measurements to reduce uncertainties in complex urban environments.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10396/17442
Fuente
Geosciences 8(4), 137 (2018)
Versión del Editor
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040137
Colecciones
  • DIR-Artículos, capítulos, libros...
  • Artículos, capítulos, libros...UCO

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contacto | Sugerencias
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital
 

 

Listar

Todo HelviaComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

De Interés

Archivo Delegado/AutoarchivoAyudaPolíticas de Helvia

Compartir


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contacto | Sugerencias
© Biblioteca Universidad de Córdoba
Biblioteca  UCODigital